Zapier vs Make vs n8n
The ultimate 3-way showdown for workflow automation
โดย Alex Chen · นักวิเคราะห์ SaaS · อัพเดท เมษายน 14, 2026 · Based on 21,400+ reviews
คำตอบใน 30 วินาที
เลือก Zapier if you want the most การเชื่อมต่อ and simplest setup for non-technical users. เลือก Make if you need ซับซ้อน logic at 3-5x lower cost than Zapier. เลือก n8n if you want self-hosted, ไม่จำกัด automations with full data control. Make ชนะ 3/10, n8n ชนะ 3/10, Zapier ชนะ 4/10 but Make is the best value.
Score สรุป
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Zapier | Make | n8n | ผู้ชนะ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | 100 tasks/mo, 5 Zaps | 1,000 ops/mo, 2 scenarios | Self-host unlimited free | ✔ n8n |
| Pricing | $19.99/mo (750 tasks) | $9/mo (10K operations) | Free self-host or $20/mo cloud | ✔ Make |
| Ease of Use | Simplest — linear step-by-step | Visual — drag-drop canvas | Technical — node-based editor | ✔ Zapier |
| Integrations | 7,000+ apps (most in industry) | 1,800+ apps + HTTP module | 400+ native + custom nodes | ✔ Zapier |
| Complex Logic | Paths, filters, formatter | Best — routers, iterators, aggregators | Excellent — JS/Python code nodes | ✔ Make |
| Self-Hosting | Not available | Not available | Full self-hosting (Docker) | ✔ n8n |
| Data Control | Cloud only, US/EU data centers | Cloud only, EU data centers | Full control with self-hosting | ✔ n8n |
| Error Handling | Basic retry and error notifications | Advanced — error routes, break/resume | Good — retry, error workflows | ✔ Make |
| AI Features | AI actions, ChatGPT integration | AI modules, OpenAI integration | AI nodes, LangChain integration | ✔ n8n |
| Community | Largest community, most templates | Growing community, good templates | Active open-source community | ✔ Zapier |
เจาะลึก: Each Tool
Zapier — The Integration King
Zapier connects to 7,000+ apps, more than any competitor. The linear step-by-step builder is the easiest way to create automations. Paths enable branching logic, and the Formatter จัดการ data transformation without code. Tables adds a simple database. For non-technical ทีม that want to automate without learning a new tool, Zapier remains the default choice.
เหมาะสำหรับ: Non-technical teams, simple integrations, and ธุรกิจ needing the widest app support.
Biggest weakness: Expensive at scale. $19.99/เดือน for just 750 tasks. Complex เวิร์กโฟลว์ are harder than in Make.
Make — The Visual Powerhouse
Make (formerly Integromat) is the sweet spot between ease of use and power. The visual canvas lets you drag-drop modules and connect them with routers, iterators, and aggregators. Complex branching logic that is painful in Zapier is intuitive in Make. At $9/เดือน for 10,000 operations, it is 3-5x cheaper than Zapier for equivalent ระบบอัตโนมัติ volume. The HTTP module lets you connect to any API.
เหมาะสำหรับ: Power ผู้ใช้ who need ซับซ้อน logic at ราคาจับต้องได้ prices, and ทีม migrating from Zapier to save money.
Biggest weakness: Steeper learning curve than Zapier. Fewer native การเชื่อมต่อ (1,800 vs 7,000). Can be overwhelming for beginners.
n8n — The Open-Source Option
n8n is the ระบบอัตโนมัติ tool for developers and privacy-conscious teams. Self-host on your own server for ไม่จำกัด เวิร์กโฟลว์ at zero cost. Write custom JavaScript or Python nodes for any integration. LangChain integration makes it the best choice for AI ระบบอัตโนมัติ workflows. The fair-code license means you can inspect and modify the source. Data never leaves your infrastructure.
เหมาะสำหรับ: Developers, privacy-conscious organizations, AI ระบบอัตโนมัติ builders, and ทีม with DevOps resources.
Biggest weakness: Requires technical skills to self-host and maintain. Smaller integration library. Cloud ราคา ($20/เดือน) is not the cheapest.
Which One Should YOU Choose?
Non-technical team?
Go Zapier. Easiest setup, most integrations, biggest template library.
Best value?
Go Make. 3-5x cheaper than Zapier with more ทรงพลัง visual logic.
Self-host / data privacy?
Go n8n. Full control, ไม่จำกัด free workflows, data never leaves your servers.
AI automation?
Go n8n. LangChain integration and custom code nodes make it the best for AI workflow building.
Also ข้อเสียidered
คำถามที่พบบ่อย
Is Make cheaper than Zapier?
Yes, 3-5x cheaper. Make offers 10,000 operations/month for $9. Zapier offers 750 tasks/month for $19.99. The savings compound at scale.
Can n8n replace Zapier?
For technical teams, yes. Self-host for free with unlimited workflows. But it requires DevOps skills that Zapier eliminates.
Which is best for non-technical users?
Zapier. Simple step-by-step builder, 7,000+ integrations, and the largest template library. Start automating in minutes.
ความเห็นบรรณาธิการ
Teams that switch from Zapier to Make 18 months ago and cut my ระบบอัตโนมัติ มีค่าใช้จ่าย by 80%. The visual builder is actually more intuitive once you learn it. For my AI workflows, I use n8n self-hosted because the LangChain integration is incredible. Zapier is still what I recommend to clients who need something working in 10 minutes with zero learning curve.
Ready to automate?
All three offer free tiers. Start automating today.
Our วิธีการวิจัย
We built identical ระบบอัตโนมัติ เวิร์กโฟลว์ on all three platforms and measured setup time, reliability, and cost. Analyzed 21,400+ reviews from G2, Capterra, and ProductHunt. ราคา verified April 2026.
Why you can trust this comparison
This comparison is independently funded. No vendor paid for placement or influenced our scores. Ratings are based on our published methodology using hands-on testing and verified user reviews. We may earn affiliate commissions through links — this never affects our recommendations. Read our full methodology →
อัพเดทล่าสุด: . ราคา and ฟีเจอร์ verified weekly.