Turso vs Neon (2026): Edge SQLite vs Serverless Postgres
By Alex Chen · นักวิเคราะห์ SaaS · อัพเดท เมษายน 13, 2026 · Based on deploying identical apps on both platforms
คำตอบใน 30 วินาที
เลือก Neonfor full serverless Postgres with branching, auto-scaling, and the massive Postgres ecosystem — it's the safer choice for most apps. เลือก Tursofor edge-first architectures where sub-millisecond global reads matter — embedded SQLite replicas at the edge are genuinely unique. Neon ชนะ 7-3 overall, but Turso's edge performance is unmatched for its use case.
คำตัดสินของเรา
Neon
- Full Postgres compatibility + extensions
- Database branching (git for databases)
- Generous free tier (0.5GB, auto-suspend)
- Cold starts on inactive databases (3-5s)
- Single region by default
- Less edge-native than Turso
🔍 เจาะลึก: Neon full analysis
ฟีเจอร์ ภาพรวม
Neon is serverless Postgres done right. Database branching lets you create instant copies of your production database for testing — like git branches for data. Auto-scaling means you pay for exactly what you use. Every Postgres extension, ORM, and tool works out of the box. For most web applications, Neon's full Postgres compatibility makes it the safest serverless database choice.
ราคา (April 2026)
| Plan | Price | ฟีเจอร์ |
|---|---|---|
| ฟรี | $0 | 0.5GB storage, auto-suspend, branching |
| Launch | $19/เดือน | 10GB storage, always-on compute |
| Scale | $69/เดือน | 50GB, auto-scaling, read replicas |
Turso
- Edge replicas — global sub-ms reads
- Embedded SQLite (libSQL fork)
- 500 databases free (great for multi-tenant)
- SQLite limitations (no Postgres extensions)
- Smaller ecosystem and community
- Higher base plan ($29/เดือน vs $19/เดือน)
🔍 เจาะลึก: Turso full analysis
ราคา (April 2026)
| Plan | Price | ฟีเจอร์ |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $0 | 500 databases, 9GB, 1B row reads |
| Scaler | $29/เดือน | 10K databases, 24GB, groups |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited, dedicated support |
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Turso | Neon | ผู้ชนะ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Database Engine | LibSQL (SQLite fork) | Full Postgres | ✔ Neon |
| SQL Compatibility | SQLite SQL subset | Full Postgres SQL | ✔ Neon |
| Edge Performance | Global edge replicas (sub-ms) | Single region default | ✔ Turso |
| Branching | Not available | Git-like DB branches | ✔ Neon |
| ฟรี Tier | 500 DBs, 9GB, 1B reads | 0.5GB, branching included | — |
| Auto-Scaling | Embedded replicas | Auto-scale compute | ✔ Neon |
| ORM Support | Drizzle, Prisma (limited) | All major ORMs | ✔ Neon |
| Cold Starts | Always warm at edge | 3-5s on inactive DBs | ✔ Turso |
| Multi-Tenant | Database-per-tenant (native) | Schema-based isolation | ✔ Turso |
| Ecosystem | Growing but niche | Massive Postgres ecosystem | ✔ Neon |
● Turso ชนะ 3 · ● Neon ชนะ 7 · Based on 16,200+ community reviews
Which do you use?
ใครควรเลือกอะไร?
→ เลือก Neon if:
You want serverless Postgres with all its power — full SQL, extensions, ORM support, and database branching. Neon is the best serverless Postgres available. The branching feature alone is revolutionary for development workflows.
→ เลือก Turso if:
You are building an edge-first application where read latency matters at a global scale. Turso embedded replicas give you sub-millisecond reads everywhere. Great for Cloudflare Workers, multi-tenant SaaS, and edge compute platforms.
→ ควรหลีกเลี่ยงทั้งคู่ถ้า:
You need a full backend platform with Auth, Storage, and Realtime — Supabase or Firebase gives you the complete stack. For simple key-value storage, consider Upstash Redis.
Best For Different Needs
Also ข้อเสียidered
We evaluated several other tools in this category before focusing on Neon vs Turso. Here are the runners-up and why they didn't make our final comparison:
คำถามที่พบบ่อย
ความเห็นบรรณาธิการ
I deployed the same Next.js app on both. Neon was the easy choice — full Postgres, Drizzle ORM worked perfectly, branching made staging environments trivial. Turso impressed me for a specific project: a multi-tenant SaaS with ผู้ใช้ in 8 countries where each tenant got their own database. The edge replicas made reads genuinely faster than anything Postgres-based could match. My recommendation: default to Neon unless you have a specific edge performance requirement, then test Turso for that one use case.
Get our free SaaS Buyer's Guide (PDF)
Save hours of research. We cover pricing traps, hidden fees, and how to negotiate better deals.
Join 0 SaaS buyers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Our วิธีการวิจัย
We deployed identical applications on both platforms, measuring query latency from multiple global regions, cold start times, migration workflows, and ราคา at various usage levels. Community data from 16,200+ reviews on GitHub, Discord, and developer forums. ราคา verified April 2026.
Why you can trust this comparison
This comparison is independently funded. No vendor paid for placement or influenced our scores. Ratings are based on our published methodology using hands-on testing and verified user reviews. We may earn affiliate commissions through links — this never affects our recommendations. Read our full methodology →
Ready to choose your database?
Both have generous free tiers. Deploy a test app on each.
Data sources: Official ราคา pages, G2.com, Capterra.com. Prices and ratings verified April 2026. We update our top 50 comparisons monthly. Read our methodology
อัพเดทล่าสุด: . ราคา and ฟีเจอร์ verified weekly.