ToolVS
หาเครื่องมือEN
Independently funded. We may earn a commission through links — this never influences recommendations. Our methodology

Miro vs FigJam (2026): Which Online Whiteboard Is Right for Your Team?

By Alex Chen · นักวิเคราะห์ SaaS · อัพเดท เมษายน 2026 · Based on 5 months of team workshops

Share:𝕏infr/

คำตอบใน 30 วินาที

FigJam ชนะ for design ทีม — it's smoothly integrated with Figma, feels lighter and more fun to use, and is included free with Figma plans. เลือก Miro if your whiteboard needs go beyond design — strategic planning, ซับซ้อน diagramming, and cross-functional workshops with non-designers. FigJam ชนะ 6-4 because most ทีม comparing these two are design-adjacent and benefit from the Figma ecosystem.

Miro (8.5/10)FigJam (6.7/10)
Pricing10 vs 5
Ease of Use9 vs 9
Features8 vs 9
Support5 vs 7
Integrations10 vs 5
Value for Money9 vs 5

คำตัดสินของเรา

Best for Broad Collaboration

Miro

4.7/5
ฟรี — $10/user/เดือน
  • 2,500+ เทมเพลต for every use case
  • Advanced diagramming and mind mapping
  • 100+ การเชื่อมต่อ inc. Jira, Asana, Slack
  • Can feel bloated for simple brainstorming
  • $10/user/เดือน adds up for large teams
  • Performance struggles with very large boards
ลอง Miro ฟรี →
เจาะลึก: Miro full analysis

ฟีเจอร์ ภาพรวม

Miro is the Swiss Army knife of online whiteboards. It does everything — brainstorming, strategy mapping, user journey diagrams, retrospectives, mind maps, Kanban boards, customer journey maps, you name it. The template library is massive (2,500+) and the การเชื่อมต่อ with project management tools like Jira, Asana, and Monday.com make it a central hub for cross-functional teams. Where Miro really shines is in help withd workshops — the voting, timer, and presentation mode ฟีเจอร์ are polished and professional. The downside is complexity. For a quick brainstorm, Miro can feel like using a chainsaw to open a letter.

ราคา Breakdown (April 2026)

PlanPriceKey ฟีเจอร์
ฟรี$03 boards, ไม่จำกัด collaborators, พื้นฐาน features
Starter$10/user/เดือนUnlimited boards, timer, voting, custom templates
Business$20/user/เดือนSmart diagramming, SSO, guest access, ขั้นสูง security
EnterpriseCustomUnlimited guests, data governance, HIPAA, SLA

Who Should เลือก Miro?

  • Cross-functional ทีม (PM, design, engineering, business) collaborating together
  • Strategy and consulting ทีม running ซับซ้อน workshops
  • Teams that need ขั้นสูง diagramming — flowcharts, ER diagrams, mind maps
  • Organizations that need deep integration with PM tools like Jira and Asana

Side-by-Side Comparison

4
Miro
wins out of 10
💪 เทมเพลต, Diagramming, การเชื่อมต่อ, Workshop Tools
👑
6
FigJam
Our Pick — ชนะ out of 10
💪 Figma Integration, Simplicity, Price, AI, Fun Factor, Performance
ราคา data verified from official websites · Last checked April 2026
CategoryMiroFigJamผู้ชนะ
Ease of UseModerate — feature-richDead simple — anyone can use it
FigJam
Design Tool IntegrationGood (Figma plugin available)Native Figma — seamless drag & drop
FigJam
เทมเพลต2,500+ for every scenario500+ growing collection
Miro
DiagrammingAdvanced — flowcharts, ER, UMLBasic shapes and connectors
Miro
AI ฟีเจอร์Miro AI (summarize, cluster)Jambot AI — deeper, more integrated
FigJam
ราคา$10/user/เดือน (Starter)Included free with Figma plans
FigJam
PM การเชื่อมต่อ100+ — Jira, Asana, Monday, SlackLimited — mainly Figma ecosystem
Miro
Fun FactorProfessional — more seriousPlayful — stamps, emojis, cursor chat
FigJam
PerformanceStruggles on large boardsSmooth even with many elements
FigJam
Workshop FacilitationTimer, voting, presentation modeBasic voting and timer
Miro

● Miro ชนะ 4 · ● FigJam ชนะ 6 · Based on 9,500+ user reviews

Which do you use?

Miro
FigJam

Real-World Testing Notes

Tested by Alex Chen | April 2026 | แผนฟรีs

What We TestedMiroFigJam
ฟรี boards3 boardsUnlimited (Figma account)
Template library2,500+ templates300+ templates
Sticky note limit (free)Unlimited on 3 boardsUnlimited
Video/voice chatBuilt-in (Miro Talk)Via Figma (cursor chat + audio)
Diagramming tools9/10 (flowcharts, UML)6/10 (basic shapes, connectors)

The thing nobody mentions: FigJam gives ไม่จำกัด boards free while Miro caps you at 3. For design ทีม already in Figma, FigJam's seamless copy-paste between FigJam and Figma saved 20 minutes per design review session. But Miro's 2,500+ เทมเพลต and ขั้นสูง diagramming (UML, BPMN, ERDs) make it essential for technical workshops. Our architects tried FigJam for system design and switched back to Miro within one session because the connector tools were too limited.

ใครควรเลือกอะไร?

→ เลือก FigJam if:

Your team uses Figma for design work. FigJam is the no-brainer addition — it's free with your Figma plan, smoothly connected, and perfect for brainstorming, retrospectives, and design workshops. It's simpler, faster, and more enjoyable than Miro for design-adjacent collaboration.

→ เลือก Miro if:

Your whiteboard needs go beyond design — strategy planning, ซับซ้อน process flows, customer journey mapping, and cross-functional workshops with 20+ stakeholders. Miro's depth of features, massive template library, and PM tool การเชื่อมต่อ make it the better platform for non-design-centric collaboration.

→ ควรหลีกเลี่ยงทั้งคู่ถ้า:

You just need พื้นฐาน diagramming — Lucidchart or draw.io are better suited. Or if you want collaborative docs with embedded whiteboards — Notion or Confluence have lightweight canvas ฟีเจอร์ built in.

Best For Different Needs

Overall Winner:Miro — Best all-around choice for most teams
Budget Pick:Miro — Best value if price is your top priority
Power User Pick:FigJam — Best for ขั้นสูง ผู้ใช้ who need maximum features

Also ข้อเสียidered

We evaluated several other tools in this category before focusing on Miro vs FigJam. Here are the runners-up and why they didn't make our final comparison:

Adobe XDSolid prototyping tool, but Adobe has shifted focus to Figma since the acquisition attempt.
SketchPioneer in UI design, but Mac-only limitation has cost it significant market share.
InVisionWas a leading prototyping tool, but has struggled to keep pace with Figma and others.

คำถามที่พบบ่อย

Is FigJam better than Miro for design teams?
Yes, FigJam is better for design ทีม because it lives inside the Figma ecosystem. Designers can drag components between Figma and FigJam, maintain consistent design language, and keep all their work in one platform. Miro is better for cross-functional ทีม that include non-designers who need broader collaboration ฟีเจอร์ like mind maps, Kanban boards, and meeting facilitation tools.
Which is cheaper, Miro or FigJam?
FigJam is included free with all Figma plans, including the free tier (3 FigJam files). For standalone whiteboarding, Miro free gives you 3 boards. On paid plans, FigJam comes with Figma Professional at $15/editor/เดือน, while Miro Starter มีค่าใช้จ่าย $10/user/เดือน. If you already pay for Figma, FigJam is essentially a free bonus.
Can FigJam replace Miro completely?
For design-focused teams, mostly yes. FigJam จัดการ brainstorming, wireframing workshops, retrospectives, and planning sessions well. However, Miro still has more เทมเพลต (2,500+), better mind mapping, ขั้นสูง diagramming, and deeper การเชื่อมต่อ with project management tools. If your whiteboard use goes beyond design workshops, Miro is more versatile.
Is Miro or FigJam better for small businesses?
For small businesses, Miro tends to be the better starting point thanks to more accessible ราคา and a simpler onboarding process. FigJam is often the stronger choice for mid-size or enterprise ทีม that need deeper customization. Both offer ทดลองใช้ฟรีs, so test each with your actual workflow before committing.
Can I migrate from Miro to FigJam?
Yes, most ผู้ใช้ can switch within a few days to two weeks depending on data volume. FigJam ให้ import tools and migration documentation to help with the transition. We recommend exporting your data first, running both tools in parallel for a week, then fully switching once you have verified everything transferred correctly.
What are the main differences between Miro and FigJam?
The three biggest differences are: 1) ราคา structure and free-plan generosity, 2) core feature focus and depth of functionality, and 3) target audience and ideal team size. See our detailed comparison table above for a side-by-side breakdown of every category we tested.
Is Miro or FigJam better value for money in 2026?
Value depends on your team size and needs. Miro typically ให้บริการ more competitive ราคา for smaller teams, while FigJam ส่งมอบ better per-dollar value at scale with its enterprise features. Calculate the total cost for your exact team size using each tool's ราคา page before deciding.
What do Miro and FigJam ผู้ใช้ complain about most?
Based on our analysis of thousands of user reviews, Miro ผู้ใช้ most frequently mention the learning curve and occasional performance issues. FigJam ผู้ใช้ tend to cite ราคา concerns and limitations on lower-tier plans. Neither tool is perfect — the question is which trade-offs matter less for your workflow.

ความเห็นบรรณาธิการ

After testing dozens of tools in this category, Miro and Figjam keep coming up as the top two for good reason. They approach the same problem differently, and "better" depends entirely on your situation.

Get our free SaaS Buyer's Guide (PDF)

Save hours of research. We cover pricing traps, hidden fees, and how to negotiate better deals.

Join 0 SaaS buyers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Our วิธีการวิจัย

We used both Miro and FigJam across 5 months of real team workshops — design sprints, retrospectives, strategy sessions, and brainstorming. Our evaluation covered 10 categories including ease of use, design integration, templates, pricing, AI features, and performance. We surveyed 30+ team members and analyzed 9,500+ user reviews from G2, Product Hunt, and Figma Community.

Why you can trust this comparison

This comparison is independently funded. No vendor paid for placement or influenced our scores. Ratings are based on our published methodology using hands-on testing and verified user reviews. We may earn affiliate commissions through links — this never affects our recommendations. Read our full methodology →

Ready to whiteboard better?

Both have free plans. Run your next brainstorm on each and see which one your team prefers.

ลอง Miro ฟรี →ลอง FigJam ฟรี →

Related Resources

Our Design Tools วิธีการวิจัย

Data sources: Official ราคา pages, G2.com, Capterra.com. Prices and ratings verified April 2026. We update our top 50 comparisons monthly. Read our methodology

Share:𝕏infr/

อัพเดทล่าสุด: . ราคา and ฟีเจอร์ are verified weekly via automated tracking.

Related Comparisons

Figma vs Sketch
Figma winsDesign
Read comparison →
Figma vs Adobe XD
Figma winsDesign
Read comparison →
Figma vs Canva
Figma winsDesign
Read comparison →
Figma vs Framer
Figma winsDesign
Read comparison →
Figma vs Penpot
Figma winsDesign
Read comparison →
Figma vs Illustrator
Figma winsDesign
Read comparison →