Loom vs Claap (2026): Which Async Video Tool Should You Choose?
By Alex Chen · นักวิเคราะห์ SaaS · อัพเดท เมษายน 11, 2026 · Based on hands-on team testing
คำตอบใน 30 วินาที
เลือก Loomสำหรับที่สุด widely-adopted async video tool — it has the simplest UX, best browser extension, and widest integrations. Recipients don't need an account to watch. เลือก Claapif you want threaded video discussions, meeting recording from Zoom/Meet, and AI transcription included free. Loom ชนะ 5-2 overall, but Claap's collaboration ฟีเจอร์ are genuinely better for product teams.
คำตัดสินของเรา
Loom
- Record and share in seconds — simplest UX
- No account needed for viewers
- Widest การเชื่อมต่อ (Slack, Notion, Jira)
- แผนฟรี: 25 videos, 5-min limit
- No meeting recording capability
- AI transcription only on paid plans
เจาะลึก: Loom full analysis
ฟีเจอร์ ภาพรวม
Loom is the category leader in async video messaging, used by over 25 million people. Acquired by Atlassian in 2023, it เชื่อมต่อ deeply with Confluence and Jira. The recording experience is dead simple — click record, share the link. Viewer วิเคราะห์ข้อมูล show who watched and for how long. AI ฟีเจอร์ include auto-titles, summaries, and filler word removal on paid plans.
ราคา Breakdown (April 2026)
| Plan | Price | Key ฟีเจอร์ |
|---|---|---|
| ฟรี | $0 | 25 videos, 5-min limit, พื้นฐาน features |
| Business | $12.50/user/เดือน | Unlimited videos, AI features, analytics |
| Enterprise | Custom | SSO, ขั้นสูง admin, SLA |
Who Should เลือก Loom?
- Remote ทีม replacing meetings with async video
- Sales ทีม sending personalized video prospecting
- Anyone wanting the simplest record-and-share workflow
- Atlassian ผู้ใช้ (Confluence, Jira integration)
Claap
- Threaded video replies for async discussions
- Records Zoom, Meet, and Teams meetings
- AI transcription included on all plans
- แผนฟรี จำกัด to 10 clips
- Smaller user base and fewer integrations
- Less polished viewer experience than Loom
เจาะลึก: Claap full analysis
ฟีเจอร์ ภาพรวม
Claap differentiates from Loom with threaded video discussions — team members can reply with their own video clips, creating async video conversations. The meeting recording feature (Zoom, Google Meet, Teams) with AI summaries is something Loom doesn't offer. Annotation tools are more advanced, making it popular with product and design ทีม doing async design reviews.
ราคา Breakdown (April 2026)
| Plan | Price | Key ฟีเจอร์ |
|---|---|---|
| ฟรี | $0 | 10 clips, AI transcription, ไม่จำกัด duration |
| Pro | $10/user/เดือน | Unlimited clips, meeting recording, threads |
| Business | Custom | Advanced analytics, SSO, admin |
Who Should เลือก Claap?
- Product ทีม doing async design reviews with annotations
- Teams wanting to record and summarize Zoom/Meet calls
- Organizations that prefer threaded video discussions
- Teams wanting AI transcription included free
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Loom | Claap | ผู้ชนะ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | Click record, share link — done | Good but slightly more complex | ✔ Loom |
| Meeting Recording | Not available | Records Zoom, Meet, Teams | ✔ Claap |
| AI Transcription | Paid plans only | Included on all plans | ✔ Claap |
| Viewer Experience | Polished — no account needed | Good but less polished | ✔ Loom |
| Analytics | Who watched, rewatch heatmap | Basic view tracking | ✔ Loom |
| การเชื่อมต่อ | Slack, Notion, Jira, Confluence, 50+ | Slack, Notion — fewer options | ✔ Loom |
| Adoption | 25M+ users, industry standard | Growing but much smaller | ✔ Loom |
● Loom ชนะ 5 · ● Claap ชนะ 2 · Based on 8,800+ user reviews
Which do you use?
ใครควรเลือกอะไร?
→ เลือก Loom if:
You want the most widely-adopted async video tool with the simplest workflow. You need recipients to view without an account. You want maximum การเชื่อมต่อ with Slack, Notion, Jira, and Confluence.
→ เลือก Claap if:
You want threaded async video discussions where teammates reply with video. You need to record and share Zoom/Google Meet meetings with AI summaries. You're a product or design team needing annotation tools for async reviews.
→ ควรหลีกเลี่ยงทั้งคู่ถ้า:
You just need quick internal screenshots — Snagit or CleanShot X are simpler. For meeting transcription only, Otter.ai or Fireflies.ai are dedicated alternatives.
Best For Different Needs
Also ข้อเสียidered
We evaluated several other tools in this category before focusing on Loom vs Claap. Here are the runners-up and why they didn't make our final comparison:
คำถามที่พบบ่อย
ความเห็นบรรณาธิการ
My team used both for a month. Loom won for everyday quick recordings — it's just faster to record and share. But Claap's threaded video replies genuinely changed how we do design reviews. If your team does a lot of async feedback loops, Claap is worth the switch. Otherwise, Loom's network effect makes it the safer bet.
Get our free SaaS Buyer's Guide (PDF)
Save hours of research. We cover pricing traps, hidden fees, and how to negotiate better deals.
Join 0 SaaS buyers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Our วิธีการวิจัย
We tested Loom and Claap with a 10-person remote team for 30 days each, covering screen recordings, async updates, design reviews, and meeting summaries. We compared recording quality, sharing UX, collaboration features, and AI capabilities. We analyzed 8,800+ reviews from G2, Capterra, and ProductHunt. ราคา verified April 2026.
Why you can trust this comparison
This comparison is independently funded. No vendor paid for placement or influenced our scores. Ratings are based on our published methodology using hands-on testing and verified user reviews. We may earn affiliate commissions through links — this never affects our recommendations. Read our full methodology →
Data sources: Official ราคา pages, G2.com, Capterra.com. Prices and ratings verified April 2026. We update our top 50 comparisons monthly. Read our methodology
Ready to try async video?
Both have free plans. Record your first video and see which feels right.
อัพเดทล่าสุด: . ราคา and ฟีเจอร์ are verified weekly via automated tracking.