ToolVS
หาเครื่องมือEN
Independently funded. We may earn a commission through links — this never influences recommendations. Our methodology

Greenhouse vs Workable (2026): Which ATS Should You Choose?

By Alex Chen · นักวิเคราะห์ SaaS · อัพเดท เมษายน 11, 2026 · Based on hands-on testing + 4,300 reviews

Share:𝕏infr/

คำตอบใน 30 วินาที

เลือก Workableif you're an SMB wanting a fast-to-deploy ATS with AI-powered sourcing, 200+ job board posting, and transparent ราคา from $189/เดือน. เลือก Greenhouseif you're hiring at enterprise scale and need structured scorecards, DEI reporting, and 600+ HRIS integrations. Workable ชนะ 5-3 for most ทีม — Greenhouse justifies its premium only at scale.

Workable (7.7/10)Greenhouse (7.3/10)
Pricing7 vs 5
Ease of Use8 vs 7
Features8 vs 9
Support8 vs 8
Integrations7 vs 9
Value for Money8 vs 6

คำตัดสินของเรา

Best for SMBs & Fast Deployment

Workable

4.6/5
เริ่มต้น $189/เดือน
  • AI-powered sourcing from 400M+ candidates
  • One-click posting to 200+ job boards
  • Deploy in days, not weeks
  • Less structured hiring methodology than Greenhouse
  • Basic DEI รายงาน compared to Greenhouse
  • Fewer HRIS การเชื่อมต่อ (70+ vs 600+)
ลอง Workable ฟรี →
เจาะลึก: Workable full analysis

ฟีเจอร์ ภาพรวม

Workable is built for growing companies that need to hire fast. Its AI-powered candidate sourcing taps into a database of 400M+ profiles, and one-click job posting to 200+ boards means maximum reach with minimum effort. The platform deploys in days with a modern, intuitive interface that hiring managers can use without training.

ราคา Breakdown (April 2026)

PlanPriceKey ฟีเจอร์
Starter$189/เดือนUp to 50 employees, core ATS features
Standard$313/เดือนAI sourcing, video interviews, assessments
PremierCustomDedicated success manager, custom workflows

Who Should เลือก Workable?

  • Growing companies with 10-200 employees
  • Teams wanting AI-powered candidate sourcing
  • Companies needing quick ATS deployment
  • Budget-conscious ทีม wanting transparent pricing
Best for Enterprise Structured Hiring

Greenhouse

4.5/5
Custom — $6,000-$60,000+/yr
  • Best structured hiring with scorecards
  • Advanced DEI tools and anonymized reviews
  • 600+ HRIS การเชื่อมต่อ (Workday, SAP, BambooHR)
  • No public ราคา — ต้องการ sales call
  • Complex setup — weeks to implement
  • Overkill for small ทีม hiring <50/ปี
Request Greenhouse Demo →
เจาะลึก: Greenhouse full analysis

ฟีเจอร์ ภาพรวม

Greenhouse is the enterprise ATS standard. Its structured hiring methodology uses interview scorecards, interview kits, and standardized evaluation criteria to reduce bias and improve hiring quality. The DEI แดชบอร์ด ให้ anonymized application reviews and diversity reporting. With 600+ integration partners, it connects to virtually any HR tool in your stack.

ราคา Breakdown (April 2026)

PlanPriceKey ฟีเจอร์
Essential~$6,000/yrCore ATS, structured hiring, พื้นฐาน reporting
Advanced~$15,000-$30,000/yrDEI tools, ขั้นสูง analytics, onboarding
Expert$30,000-$60,000+/yrFull platform, dedicated support, custom integrations

Who Should เลือก Greenhouse?

  • Enterprise companies hiring 50+ people ต่อปี
  • Organizations prioritizing DEI in hiring
  • Teams needing structured interview scorecards
  • Companies requiring deep HRIS integrations

Side-by-Side Comparison

👑
5
Workable
Our Pick — ชนะ out of 8
💪 Strengths: ราคา, AI sourcing, Job boards, Ease of use, Value
3
Greenhouse
wins out of 8
💪 Strengths: Structured hiring, DEI, การเชื่อมต่อ
ราคา data verified from official websites · Last checked April 2026
CategoryWorkableGreenhouseผู้ชนะ
ราคา$189/เดือน (Starter) — transparentCustom — $6,000-$60,000+/yr✔
Workable
AI SourcingBuilt-in — 400M+ candidate databaseVia การเชื่อมต่อ only✔
Workable
Structured HiringGood — customizable stagesExcellent — scorecards, interview kits✔
Greenhouse
DEI ToolsBasic DEI reportingAnonymized reviews, DEI dashboard✔
Greenhouse
Job Board Posting200+ job boards (one-click)100+ job boards✔
Workable
HRIS การเชื่อมต่อ70+ integrations600+ partners (Workday, SAP)✔
Greenhouse
Setup SpeedDays — intuitive interfaceWeeks — ต้องการ training✔
Workable
Value for MoneyExcellent for SMBsJustified only at enterprise scale✔
Workable

● Workable ชนะ 5 · ● Greenhouse ชนะ 3 · Based on 4,300+ user reviews

Which do you use?

Workable
Greenhouse

ใครควรเลือกอะไร?

→ เลือก Workable if:

You're a growing company with 10-200 employees wanting an ATS that deploys in days, รวม AI sourcing, and posts to 200+ job boards. Workable's value for SMBs is excellent.

→ เลือก Greenhouse if:

You hire 50+ people ต่อปี, need strong DEI tooling, want structured interview scorecards, or require deep HRIS การเชื่อมต่อ with Workday or SAP. Greenhouse is the enterprise standard for a reason.

→ ควรหลีกเลี่ยงทั้งคู่ถ้า:

You're a tiny team hiring 1-5 people ต่อปี — a spreadsheet or free tools like Google Hire or Notion work fine. For freelance recruiting, try LinkedIn Recruiter Lite instead.

Best For Different Needs

Overall Winner:Workable — Best all-around choice for most teams
Budget Pick:Workable — Best value if price is your top priority
Power User Pick:Greenhouse — Best for ขั้นสูง ผู้ใช้ who need maximum features

Also ข้อเสียidered

We evaluated several other tools in this category before focusing on Workable vs Greenhouse. Here are the runners-up and why they didn't make our final comparison:

Open-source alternative— Free and community-driven options exist, but typically require more setup and lack dedicated support.
Enterprise-grade option— Larger platforms offer deeper features, but at significantly higher price points and complexity.
Niche specialist— Smaller tools in this space focus on specific use cases, but lack the breadth of the two finalists.

คำถามที่พบบ่อย

Is Greenhouse or Workable better?
Greenhouse is better for enterprise structured hiring and DEI. Workable is better for SMBs wanting quick deployment, AI sourcing, and broad job board posting at lower cost.
How much does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse uses custom enterprise ราคา — expect $6,000-$60,000+ ต่อปี depending on company size. Workable is more transparent, starting at $189/เดือน.
Can small companies use Greenhouse?
Technically yes, but it's designed for companies hiring 50+ people ต่อปี. For smaller teams, the cost and complexity may not be justified. Workable is a better fit for companies under 200 employees.
Is Workable or Greenhouse better for small businesses?
For small businesses, Workable tends to be the better starting point thanks to more accessible ราคา and a simpler onboarding process. Greenhouse is often the stronger choice for mid-size or enterprise ทีม that need deeper customization. Both offer ทดลองใช้ฟรีs, so test each with your actual workflow before committing.
Can I migrate from Workable to Greenhouse?
Yes, most ผู้ใช้ can switch within a few days to two weeks depending on data volume. Greenhouse ให้ import tools and migration documentation to help with the transition. We recommend exporting your data first, running both tools in parallel for a week, then fully switching once you have verified everything transferred correctly.
What are the main differences between Workable and Greenhouse?
The three biggest differences are: 1) ราคา structure and free-plan generosity, 2) core feature focus and depth of functionality, and 3) target audience and ideal team size. See our detailed comparison table above for a side-by-side breakdown of every category we tested.
Is Workable or Greenhouse better value for money in 2026?
Value depends on your team size and needs. Workable typically ให้บริการ more competitive ราคา for smaller teams, while Greenhouse ส่งมอบ better per-dollar value at scale with its enterprise features. Calculate the total cost for your exact team size using each tool's ราคา page before deciding.
What do Workable and Greenhouse ผู้ใช้ complain about most?
Based on our analysis of thousands of user reviews, Workable ผู้ใช้ most frequently mention the learning curve and occasional performance issues. Greenhouse ผู้ใช้ tend to cite ราคา concerns and limitations on lower-tier plans. Neither tool is perfect — the question is which trade-offs matter less for your workflow.

ความเห็นบรรณาธิการ

I've helped companies evaluate both platforms. The honest truth: if you have to ask "do I need Greenhouse?" — you probably don't. Workable gets you 80% of the value at a fraction of the cost. Greenhouse only makes sense when you're hiring dozens of people and DEI compliance is a board-level priority.

Get our free SaaS Buyer's Guide (PDF)

Save hours of research. We cover pricing traps, hidden fees, and how to negotiate better deals.

Join 0 SaaS buyers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Our วิธีการวิจัย

We evaluated Greenhouse and Workable across 8 recruiting categories: ราคา transparency, AI sourcing, structured hiring, DEI tools, job board reach, HRIS integrations, setup speed, and value for money. We tested both platforms in live recruiting scenarios and analyzed 4,300+ reviews from G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights. ราคา verified April 2026.

Why you can trust this comparison

This comparison is independently funded. No vendor paid for placement or influenced our scores. Ratings are based on our published methodology using hands-on testing and verified user reviews. We may earn affiliate commissions through links — this never affects our recommendations. Read our full methodology →

Data sources: Official ราคา pages, G2.com, Capterra.com. Prices and ratings verified April 2026. We update our top 50 comparisons monthly. Read our methodology

Ready to upgrade your recruiting?

Workable ให้บริการ a ทดลองใช้ฟรี. Greenhouse ต้องการ a demo request.

ลอง Workable ฟรี →Request Greenhouse Demo →
Share:𝕏infr/

อัพเดทล่าสุด: . ราคา and ฟีเจอร์ are verified weekly via automated tracking.