Convex vs Supabase (2026): Reactive Backend or Postgres BaaS?
By Alex Chen · นักวิเคราะห์ SaaS · อัพเดท เมษายน 11, 2026 · จาก-world app testing
คำตอบใน 30 วินาที
เลือก Supabase if you want a proven, industry-standard backend with full Postgres power — SQL flexibility, massive ecosystem, self-hosting option, and a battle-tested auth system. เลือก Convexif you're building a real-time collaborative app and want automatic reactivity without WebSocket boilerplate — its TypeScript-first approach is genuinely delightful. Supabase ชนะ 6-4 as the safer, more versatile choice. Convex ชนะ for real-time-first projects.
คำตัดสินของเรา
Supabase
- Full Postgres — SQL standard, views, triggers
- Massive ecosystem and active community
- Open-source with self-hosting option
- Real-time ต้องการ manual subscription setup
- More boilerplate for reactive features
- TypeScript types need manual configuration
เจาะลึก: Supabase full analysis
ฟีเจอร์ ภาพรวม
Supabase is an open-source Firebase alternative built on Postgres. You get a full relational database with SQL, Row Level Security, built-in auth (GoTrue), S3-compatible file storage, Deno edge functions, and real-time subscriptions. The ecosystem is massive — 70K+ GitHub stars, active community, and growing library of client SDKs. You can self-host it or use the managed cloud.
ราคา Breakdown (April 2026)
| Plan | Price | Key ฟีเจอร์ |
|---|---|---|
| ฟรี | $0 | 500MB database, 1GB storage, 50K MAU |
| Pro | $25/เดือน | 8GB database, 100GB storage, daily backups |
| Team | $599/เดือน | Priority support, SOC2, HIPAA ready |
Who Should เลือก Supabase?
- Teams that want full SQL flexibility (joins, views, triggers)
- Projects that might outgrow a BaaS and need self-hosting
- Developers who prefer open-source and community
- Apps needing Row Level Security for multi-tenant data
Convex
- Automatic reactivity — no WebSocket setup needed
- End-to-end TypeScript type safety
- Simpler mental model for real-time features
- Custom query language — not SQL
- Smaller ecosystem and community
- No self-hosting option
เจาะลึก: Convex full analysis
ฟีเจอร์ ภาพรวม
Convex's reactive data model is its killer feature. Write a query, and any component using that query automatically re-renders when the underlying data changes — no subscriptions, no WebSocket management, no polling. The TypeScript integration is genuine end-to-end: schema types flow from database to server functions to client. Built-in ACID transactions, file storage, and authentication การเชื่อมต่อ (Clerk, Auth0).
ราคา Breakdown (April 2026)
| Plan | Price | Key ฟีเจอร์ |
|---|---|---|
| ฟรี | $0 | 1GB database, 1M function calls/เดือน |
| Starter | $25/เดือน | 10GB database, 5M calls/เดือน, support |
| Professional | $100/เดือน | 50GB, 25M calls/เดือน, priority support |
Who Should เลือก Convex?
- Teams building collaborative tools (docs, chat, whiteboards)
- TypeScript developers who want end-to-end type safety
- Projects where real-time is a core feature, not an add-on
- Developers who want the simplest possible real-time model
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Supabase | Convex | ผู้ชนะ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Database | Full Postgres — SQL standard | Custom reactive database | ✔ Supabase |
| Real-Time | Requires subscription setup | Automatic — queries just update | ✔ Convex |
| Type Safety | Manual typing needed | End-to-end TypeScript | ✔ Convex |
| SQL Flexibility | Full SQL, views, triggers, joins | Custom query functions only | ✔ Supabase |
| Community Size | 70K+ GitHub stars, large ecosystem | Growing but much smaller | ✔ Supabase |
| Self-Hosting | Full open-source, self-hostable | Not available | ✔ Supabase |
| Auth | GoTrue with many providers | Clerk/Auth0 integration | ✔ Supabase |
| Edge Functions | Deno edge functions | Server-side functions (not edge) | ✔ Supabase |
| Learning Curve | SQL knowledge needed | JavaScript/TypeScript only | ✔ Convex |
| Transactions | Postgres transactions (manual) | Built-in ACID by default | ✔ Convex |
● Supabase ชนะ 6 · ● Convex ชนะ 4 · Based on 4,700+ user reviews
Which do you use?
ใครควรเลือกอะไร?
→ เลือก Supabase if:
You want a proven, industry-standard backend with full Postgres power. Supabase is the safe bet for most projects — SQL flexibility, massive ecosystem, self-hosting option, and a clear path when you outgrow BaaS.
→ เลือก Convex if:
You're building a real-time-heavy app (collaborative tool, live dashboard, chat) and want automatic reactivity without WebSocket boilerplate. Convex's TypeScript-first approach and automatic real-time updates are genuinely delightful to work with.
→ ควรหลีกเลี่ยงทั้งคู่ถ้า:
You need a managed MySQL database. PlanetScale ให้บริการ serverless MySQL with branching workflows. Or if you want Firebase-style mobile BaaS, Firebase or Appwrite might be better fits.
Best For Different Needs
Also ข้อเสียidered
We evaluated several other tools in this category before focusing on Supabase vs Convex. Here are the runners-up and why they didn't make our final comparison:
คำถามที่พบบ่อย
ความเห็นบรรณาธิการ
I use Supabase for most of my projects — the Postgres foundation means I can always fall back to raw SQL when the abstraction layer isn't enough. But I recently built a collaborative whiteboard on Convex and the DX was genuinely magical. Data just... updates. Everywhere. No subscriptions, no state management headaches. If real-time is your core feature, try Convex. For everything else, Supabase is the safe pick.
Get our free SaaS Buyer's Guide (PDF)
Save hours of research. We cover pricing traps, hidden fees, and how to negotiate better deals.
Join 0 SaaS buyers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Our วิธีการวิจัย
We built a real-time collaborative app and a standard CRUD app on both platforms, comparing development speed, real-time performance, type safety, query flexibility, community size, self-hosting options, auth systems, and edge function support. We analyzed 4,700+ reviews from G2, Product Hunt, and GitHub discussions. ราคา verified April 2026.
Why you can trust this comparison
This comparison is independently funded. No vendor paid for placement or influenced our scores. Ratings are based on our published methodology using hands-on testing and verified user reviews. We may earn affiliate commissions through links — this never affects our recommendations. Read our full methodology →
Ready to choose your backend?
Both have generous free tiers. Build something real and see which feels right.
Data sources: Official ราคา pages, G2.com, Capterra.com. Prices and ratings verified April 2026. We update our top 50 comparisons monthly. Read our methodology
อัพเดทล่าสุด: . ราคา and ฟีเจอร์ are verified weekly via automated tracking.