Zapier vs Make (2026): Which Automation Tool Should You Use?
Hands-On Findings (April 2026)
I rebuilt the same 9-step workflow — Typeform → Airtable → GPT-4 summary → Slack → HubSpot contact → Gmail follow-up — on both platforms. Zapier consumed 9 tasks per run. Make consumed 14 operations for the same logic because every iterator, router, and data transformer counts separately. At 500 runs/month, Zapier cost $29 on the Pro plan. Make cost $9 on Core with room for 3x more runs. What I didn't expect: Make's scenario failed twice in 48 hours because of a Typeform webhook timeout quirk — Zapier's auto-replay caught the same drops silently. Debugging on Make required manually re-running the affected bundles.
What we got wrong in our last review:
- We said Make was 3x cheaper than Zapier. After accounting for operation overhead on routers/iterators, the real gap on complex flows is 1.6–2.2x.
- We praised Zapier's "Paths" feature. In 2026, Make's router+filter combo now handles 95% of branching cases cleaner and with clearer visual logic.
- We claimed both had identical OpenAI integrations. Make's GPT-4 module supports streaming chunks; Zapier's still returns blocking calls that time out on 8K+ token responses.
Edge case that broke Zapier:
Sending an array of 240 Airtable records to a single Zapier step triggered silent truncation at record 100 — no error, no warning. Make's iterator handled the same batch without a hiccup. Workaround in Zapier: insert a "Looping by Zapier" step that fetches 50 records at a time, which doubles task consumption but preserves data integrity on large batches.
By Alex Chen, SaaS Analyst · Updated April 8, 2026
30-Second Answer
Choose Zapier if you want the simplest setup with the most app connections (7,000+) and don't mind paying more. Choose Make if you need complex automations with branching logic at a fraction of the cost. Make offers 4-10x better value per dollar. Zapier offers 4x more app integrations.
Verified Data (April 2026)
Make is ~70% cheaper for equivalent volume. Zapier has 8,500+ apps vs Make ~2,400. Zapier does NOT count triggers as tasks; Make counts ALL executions.
Sources: zapier.com/pricing, make.com/pricing, G2.com. Last verified April 2026.
Score Breakdown
| Category | Zapier | Make | Winner | WINNER |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | 100 tasks/month, 5 Zaps | 1,000 ops/month, 2 scenarios | ✔ Make | |
| Paid Starting Price | $19.99/mo (750 tasks) | $9/mo (10,000 ops) | ✔ Make | |
| Cost per Operation | ~$0.027/task | ~$0.001/operation | ✔ Make | |
| App Connections | 7,000+ apps | 1,800+ apps | ✔ Zapier | |
| Ease of Use | Very easy (linear flow) | Moderate (visual builder) | ✔ Zapier | |
| Complex Workflows | Paths (paid), limited branching | Full branching, loops, routers | ✔ Make | |
| Error Handling | Basic retry | Advanced (break, retry, ignore) | ✔ Make | |
| Data Transformation | Limited (needs Formatter) | Built-in functions + JSON | ✔ Make | |
| API/Webhooks | Webhooks (paid) | HTTP module + webhooks (free) | ✔ Make | |
| Speed | 15-min polling (free) | Instant webhooks + 15-min | ✔ Zapier |
● Zapier wins 3 · ● Make wins 7 · Make dominates on value and power
Which do you use?
Real-World Testing Notes
Tested by Alex Chen | April 2026 | Free plans
| What We Tested | Zapier | Make |
|---|---|---|
| First automation built | 8 min | 15 min (steeper learning) |
| Free tasks/operations per month | 100 tasks | 1,000 operations |
| Complex branching logic | Limited (paths on paid) | Built-in (routers, free) |
| Error handling | Basic retry | Advanced (error routes) |
| App connections | 7,000+ apps | 1,800+ apps |
The thing nobody mentions: Make gives you 10x more free operations than Zapier (1,000 vs 100). For power users, Make's visual builder with routers and iterators is genuinely more capable. But Zapier's simplicity means your non-technical teammates can actually build their own automations.
Who Should Choose What?
→ Choose Zapier if:
You're non-technical, need simple A→B automations, and want the most app connections. Budget isn't the main concern. Best for small business owners and marketers.
→ Choose Make if:
You need complex workflows with conditions, loops, and data transformation. You want 10x more operations per dollar. Best for agencies, developers, power users, and anyone running high-volume automations.
Best For Different Needs
FAQ
Also Considered
We evaluated several other tools in this category before focusing on Zapier vs Make. Here are the runners-up and why they didn't make our final comparison:
Editor's Take
I recommend Zapier to about 60% of people who ask me. The other 40%? Make. The split usually comes down to budget and team size. Startups tend to prefer one, enterprises the other.
Get our free SaaS Buyer's Guide (PDF)
Save hours of research. We cover pricing traps, hidden fees, and how to negotiate better deals.
Join 0 SaaS buyers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Related Resources
Data sources: Official pricing pages, G2.com, Capterra.com. Prices and ratings verified April 2026. We update our top 50 comparisons monthly. Read our methodology
Verify Independently
Don't take our word for it. Cross-reference these comparisons against real user reviews on independent platforms:
Star ratings shown are aggregate signals from each platform's public listing pages. Click through to read individual reviews and verify our analysis. We update aggregate counts quarterly.
What Real Users Say
Synthesized from public reviews on G2, Capterra, Reddit, and Trustpilot. We update aggregate themes quarterly. Click platform badges in the section above to read individual reviews.
Last updated: