ToolVS

Bun vs Deno (2026): Which JavaScript Runtime Wins?

By ToolVS Research Team · Updated April 9, 2026 · Based on real-world testing

Share:𝕏infr/

Quick verdict: Bun wins 6-4 for speed. Bun is blazing fast -- installs packages in seconds, runs scripts faster than Node, and includes a bundler and test runner built-in. Deno is more secure by default and has better TypeScript support. For raw speed and Node.js compatibility, Bun. For security-first and clean standards, Deno.

Our Verdict

Most Secure Runtime

Deno

⭐ 4.5/5
Free (open source)
  • Secure by default — permission system
  • Native TypeScript — no config needed
  • Web standard APIs throughout
  • Slower than Bun in benchmarks
  • npm compatibility still catching up
  • Smaller package ecosystem
Try Deno →

Side-by-Side Comparison

👑
6
Bun
Our Pick
4
Deno
wins out of 10
CategoryBunDenoWinner
Raw SpeedFastest JS runtime availableFast but behind Bun
Bun
Node.js CompatibilityNear-perfect npm/node compatImproving but gaps remain
Bun
SecurityStandard permissionsSecure by default — explicit permissions
Deno
TypeScriptNative but needs tsconfigNative — zero config
Deno
Package Managementbun install — fastest evernpm: specifier system
Bun
Built-in ToolsBundler + test runner + PMTest runner + formatter + linter
Bun
Web StandardsSome supportFully web-standard APIs
Deno
Windows SupportImprovingFull Windows support
Deno
Deploy (Cloud)Growing supportDeno Deploy — excellent
Deno
MaturityYounger, some rough edgesMore mature, stable
Deno

Which do you use?

Bun
Deno

Who Should Choose What?

Choose Bun if:

Speed is your priority. Bun makes everything faster -- installs, scripts, tests, bundling. If you have an existing Node.js project and want an instant speed boost, bun is often a drop-in replacement. The all-in-one toolkit (bundler + test runner + PM) also reduces dependency count.

Choose Deno if:

Security and web standards matter most. Deno permission system prevents supply chain attacks by default. Native TypeScript with zero config is delightful. Deno Deploy is also an excellent serverless platform. Best for security-conscious teams and new TypeScript projects.

FAQ

Is Bun faster than Deno?
Yes, significantly. Bun consistently outperforms Deno (and Node.js) in HTTP benchmarks, file I/O, and package installation. However, Deno has better security defaults and TypeScript support. Speed is not everything — consider your priorities.

Get our free SaaS Buyer's Guide (PDF)

Save hours of research. We cover pricing traps, hidden fees, and how to negotiate better deals.

Join 0 SaaS buyers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Our Methodology

We benchmarked both runtimes on HTTP throughput, file I/O, startup time, and package installation speed. Also evaluated real-world development experience building identical applications over 30 days.

Ready to choose?

Try Bun →Try Deno →
Share:𝕏infr/

Last updated: . Pricing and features verified weekly.